Federal funding and supportive policies for research.
نویسنده
چکیده
TODAY, THE UNITED STATES IS ONLY ONE DECADE REmoved from what was then a forecast of difficult meager times for the national investment in medical and scientific research. In 1995, the US House of Representatives budget resolution called for a cut in funding for the National Institutes of Health (NIH) of 5% for fiscal year (FY) 1996 and a freeze on NIH funding through FY 2000. However, the NIH received an increase of almost 6% for FY 1996, followed by 7% increases in the following 2 years when the economy was not yet strong. Those years of increases were followed by the remarkable feat of doubling the NIH budget over 5 years—FYs 1999-2003. Bad news can be turned into good news, bad numbers into better, even pacesetting ones. Influencing the impact of current political and economic realities on the United States investment in research requires recognition of some somber realities. Now, the nation is engaged in a costly war; is attempting to protect itself from probable terrorist attacks; has an exploding population of senior citizens who, remarkably, given not-so-distant history, now live for decades with chronic diseases; and now has recordbreaking federal budget deficits. Although the priorities in competition for financial resources may be different today than in decades past, the United States has been and will always be a nation with competing priorities. Members of the US Congress and appropriators specifically are charged with establishing priorities for expenditure of the nation’s fiscal resources. The administration and Congress must be continually informed of the very high priority the public consistently assigns to investment in research. Success is achieved by those who fight for what they believe in and who are willing to work to translate beliefs into reality. The enormous promise of medical and scientific research—in both lifesaving and economic terms—will not be realized without the hard work and smart work of a unified constituency committed to advancing science and saving lives.
منابع مشابه
A national survey of policies on disclosure of conflicts of interest in biomedical research.
BACKGROUND Conflicts of interest pose a threat to the integrity of scientific research. The current regulations of the U.S. Public Health Service and the National Science Foundation require that medical schools and other research institutions report the existence of conflicts of interest to the funding agency but allow the institutions to manage conflicts internally. The regulations do not spec...
متن کاملFederal Policies for Research on Children | American Psychologist 34(10) 1009-1016
Readers of this issue of the American Psychologist will have two interests in the federal government's policies for research on children. First, there is the important practical question of whether financial support for one's field is available. Second, there is a set of general issues concerning how government has involved itself in research on children and the influence of federal funding pol...
متن کاملInstitutional Conflict of Interest Policies at U.S. Academic Research Institutions.
PURPOSE Institutional conflicts of interest (ICOIs) occur when the institution or leaders with authority to act on behalf of the institution have conflicts of interest (COIs) that may threaten the objectivity, integrity, or trustworthiness of research because they could impact institutional decision making. The purpose of this study was to gather and analyze information about the ICOI policies ...
متن کاملHuman Embryo and Fetal Research: Medical Support and Political Controversy
promise of research involving human embryos and fetuses for the advancement of basic science as well as for the development of lifesaving vaccines and therapies. Such research continues to this day as scientists seek new treatments for a variety of diseases, such as Alzheimer’s disease, Parkinson’s disease, diabetes, heart disease and kidney failure. But government funding for human embryo and ...
متن کاملEffects of government incentives on wind innovation in the United States
In the United States, as elsewhere, state and federal governments have considered or implemented a range of policies to create more sustainable energy generation systems in response to concerns over climate change, security of fuel supply, and environmental impacts. These policies include both regulatory instruments such as renewable portfolio standards (RPSs) and market incentives such as tax ...
متن کاملThe state of transgender health care: policy, law, and medical frameworks.
I review the current status of transgender people's access to health care in the United States and analyze federal policies regarding health care services for transgender people and the limitations thereof. I suggest a preliminary outline to enhance health care services and recommend the formulation of explicit federal policies regarding the provision of health care services to transgender peop...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- JAMA
دوره 294 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005